Escapecraft

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 14:37**

Just how in touch with nature are you? Do you try to kill any living thing you see? or do you prefer to save them from death and try and help them on there way as it were.

I try not to kill insects or animals etc and have decided to worship/support/whatever you want to say etc Gaia

How about you?

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 14:59**

I support no hurting in any way, except self defense.

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 15:11**

I will do anything I can to Survive on this planet.

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 15:28**

nart_21086 wrote:I will do anything I can to Survive on this planet.

Will you do more than ''Survive''?

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 15:57**

Fiskarfred wrote:
nart_21086 wrote:I will do anything I can to Survive on this planet.
Will you do more than ''Survive''?

Probably not.

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 17:15**

I dont go out with intent to destroy though if im hungry and in the wilderness i will kill animals without remorse. After all ther is a point to the food chain. If were at the top, hurrah. Though i dont agree with overkill. Like extinction will just mess up the food chain and so should be avoided.
Though i keep a sense of honour, if i see a dead animal i will most likley bury it.
Though i dont have the same sense of "aww its cute and fluffly dont kill it" if its tasty and im hungry, Nom nom away.

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 17:33**

Well, I am with Arogon, I wont hurt someone unless its natural or in self defense.

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 18:19**

Generally I am opposed to killing any semi-sentient being personally, though I won't object to it if someone else does the deed. I'm just not the kind of person who can easily take a life, even one of an animal.

Except bugs. F*** bugs.

Posted: **26 Jun 2011, 18:34**

i shoot rabbits and pigeons in my garden and dont blink. they are delicious and it keeps the Veg patch mostly whole

.

Posted: **06 Jul 2011, 22:54**

Godavari wrote:Posted: 26 Jun 2011, 19:19
Generally I am opposed to killing any semi-sentient being personally, though I won't object to it if someone else does the deed. I'm just not the kind of person who can easily take a life, even one of an animal.

Except bugs. F*** bugs.

This. Except for rollie pollies. They're cute.

Posted: **06 Jul 2011, 22:56**

Godavari wrote:Generally I am opposed to killing any semi-sentient being personally, though I won't object to it if someone else does the deed. I'm just not the kind of person who can easily take a life, even one of an animal.

Except bugs. F*** bugs.

This.

Posted: **08 Jul 2011, 11:43**

I support hunting to save money on food, but just killing anything you see and leaving it there to rot is plain wrong. As for the planet, as a Christian God tells us to be responsible with the world, but I say that the planet isn't as important as you.

Posted: **09 Jul 2011, 18:43**

Sir_Luke wrote: As for the planet, as a Christian God tells us to be responsible with the world, but I say that the planet isn't as important as you.

Actually, the planet's wellbeing is one of my greatest interests. Due to this i wish humanity was eradicated but that's hardly going to happen.

And whilst your Christian God mearly tells you to be responsible for the world, the Titan Mother Gaia basically IS the world

Posted: **10 Jul 2011, 16:57**

Well, if God made the world then He's better then Titan Mother Gaia.

Posted: **12 Jul 2011, 20:47**

With all the "Kill 99% germs!" lotions and soaps, I think we're all a little hypocritical to the "no killing living beings" deal.

Solution ? Don't bathe or eat.

Posted: **15 Jul 2011, 20:59**

Zinrius wrote:With all the "Kill 99% germs!" lotions and soaps, I think we're all a little hypocritical to the "no killing living beings" deal.

Solution ? Don't bathe or eat.

REALLY SMART!

Posted: **17 Jul 2011, 16:34**

small point zin... i dont bathe much and you can ask my parents about eating much. I can survive quite happily on 1 small meal/snack a day

Also i used soap recently and got a rather bad rash all up the arm that held the soap

Posted: **17 Jul 2011, 17:39**

lolsurewill. I see you at skewl >:P

Posted: **17 Jul 2011, 19:07**

I have no qualms killing anything other than a human. The reason being, is that it is pretty much impossible to live without killing something, so rather than make arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on "cuteness" or whatever, I just say don't kill Humans, and that's it.

Posted: **17 Jul 2011, 19:10**

If you want to eat an animal you ought to be willing to kill it. Willing, mind you. You may not be in a position to actually do so.

The idea that it's alright to eat an animal so long as you don't kill it is hypocrisy, because it implies someone else has to commit the "wrong" act for your own enjoyment.

Posted: **18 Jul 2011, 20:09**

Wildwill002 wrote:small point zin... i dont bathe much and you can ask my parents about eating much. I can survive quite happily on 1 small meal/snack a day

Also i used soap recently and got a rather bad rash all up the arm that held the soap

You sir, are disgusting.

Posted: **18 Jul 2011, 22:20**

Zehydra wrote:I have no qualms killing anything other than a human. The reason being, is that it is pretty much impossible to live without killing something, so rather than make arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on "cuteness" or whatever, I just say don't kill Humans, and that's it.

What about making arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on endangered status?

Posted: **18 Jul 2011, 22:21**

697134002 wrote:What about making arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on endangered status?

Need me some sweet fur pelts.

And tigers? Fuck tigers. And polar bears. And pandas (though that's what they need).

Posted: **18 Jul 2011, 22:33**

Lord_Mountbatten wrote:
697134002 wrote:What about making arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on endangered status?
Need me some sweet fur pelts.

And tigers? Fuck tigers. And polar bears. And pandas (though that's what they need).

Posted: **18 Jul 2011, 22:35**

Zinrius wrote:
Lord_Mountbatten wrote:
697134002 wrote:What about making arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on endangered status?
Need me some sweet fur pelts.

And tigers? Fuck tigers. And polar bears. And pandas (though that's what they need).
*lolattachment*

I love both of you.

Posted: **19 Jul 2011, 13:58**

If an animal went after me I'd take it out without remorse. If I'm starving in the wilderness, I'll kill and eat whatever I can. I love animals, but if it's life or death, it's game on.

Posted: **19 Jul 2011, 15:57**

697134002 wrote:
Zehydra wrote:I have no qualms killing anything other than a human. The reason being, is that it is pretty much impossible to live without killing something, so rather than make arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on "cuteness" or whatever, I just say don't kill Humans, and that's it.
What about making arbitrary rules on what you can kill based on endangered status?

Well, if the majority wants them to survive, because they like them, then I don't care if they restrict me from killing them. It's not that I enjoy killing animals, but I don't feel morally wrong for doing so.

Posted: **20 Jul 2011, 13:14**

Animals are tasty.

Posted: **20 Jul 2011, 13:16**

Especially beef critters...

Posted: **20 Jul 2011, 16:46**

Cho wrote:Especially beef critters...

Even more so kittens >:D

Escapecraft

Nature and you.

Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.

Re: Nature and you.